
1. With the expected absence of Megatron this Sunday, how do you attack the Packers defense with the weapons you have?
Steve, Detroit Lions Weblog: The Lions had better be prepared to be able to run the ball with an additional man in the box, because no team will respect the Lions aerial attack (especially stretching the field vertically) without Johnson.
The Packers, who feature “bump-and-run” man coverage corners in Al Harris and Charles Woodson, have oddly enough played more zone coverage within Dom Capers 3-4 defensive scheme. If the Packers continue to consistently play zone coverage, given the fact that the Lions are targeting Brandon Pettigrew more frequently, Pettigrew and the slot receivers should be able to find voids in the Packers coverage and take advantage of the Packers lack of a consistent pass rush within their new scheme.
I also expect that the Lions will utilize more screens, swing passes and underneath patterns in an attempt to get the ball out of Daunte Culpepper’s hands quicker, if he is indeed the game’s starter.
Phil, MLive: The offensive line has been up and down this year. The last two games, the line has struggled, both in establishing the run as well as protecting the quarterback. I think the Lions can run on Green Bay if they play like they did against the Vikings and Redskins. That, of course, would open up the pass, where they’ll utilize two tight end sets. Ultimately, though, it’s going to be tough for the team to get it going, offensively, without their star receiver and starting quarterback. The one person who gives them a chance is offensive coordinator Scott Linehan. He’s proven to be creative in his play-calling, adept at catching opponents off guard. Things haven’t always worked to perfection, but I think he’s been able to dial up the right calls to put the players in position to win. Whether they take advantage of being in that position is another question altogether.
Big Al, The Wayne Fontes Experience: Let’s not forget the Lions will also be without Matthew Stafford as well, which is an even bigger loss to the Detroit offense.
Yardage-wise, the Packers’ defense is almost as bad the Lions’ put upon defense, giving up 335 YPG to Detroit’s 358 YPG. In fact, their run defense is just as bad as the Lions’, giving up one yard less a game, 112 to 113. It’s safe to say the Lions are not facing a juggernaut on defensive side of the ball.
With Kevin Smith saying earlier this week the lack of a running game was his fault, what better time to put his theory to the test? Give Smith all the carries he can handle, which should keep the mistakes made by Daunte Culpepper to a minimum. I trust Smith to do the right thing with the ball much more than I do Culpepper. That being, not turning it over!
Another reason to give to ball to Smith? The Packers are tied for third in the NFL in interceptions, with 7. After watching Culpepper hold onto the ball too long and throw it up for grabs against the Steelers, the last thing I want is watching Stafford’s backup doing the same against Green Bay.
The Lions need to keep the Packers’ offense off the field. The best way to do so is to attack the Pack with Smith.
Jeff, Motown Madmen: Run the ball right away. I imagine that Culpepper will be starting this week. There’s not much left to do but run as his usual dink and dunk “passing” won’t win games. The Packers will likely put a lot of pressure on Culpepper so he will have no time in the pocket and either take more sacks, as shown he will last week, or make mistakes. Kevin Smith will have to step it up as well as play by Pettigrew and Heller. If they can establish the run, the short little passes by Daunte may let them score some points. If Stafford does play, start with the run and then let him air it out. As CJ is not expected to be in the line-up, B Johnson, Northcutt and Standeford as well as Heller and Pettigrew should be there to take up the slack. Go deep with Stafford’s rocket launcher and hope for the best.
Josh, Roar of the Lions: While the loss of Megatron (I’m assuming) this week is not good for the Lions, you do what you can. The trick this game is going to be running on the Packers D (which has not been particularly effective against the run) and most importantly, establishing the play-action game. This is the gameplan Minnesota followed, and the one the Lions need to imitate. Fortunately, if the Vikings can pull of the passing game against the Pack that they did with their WR, that should mean Northcutt, BJ, Standeford & Williams can step up and take care of business. What will really matter in this matchup is how the Lions Offensive Line takes on the Packers Dline. Kampman is still not comfortable at OLB, and this only helps the Lions as the Pack had ZERO pass rush on Minny — even worse than the Lions’ line did against them (if that is possible) so protection should be there.
If Daunte plays, the Lions lose. If Stafford starts, they have a chance to keep pace with Rodgers and the pack as long as the Lions D can keep blitzing pressure on him like Minny did. With Daunte under center and CJ, I see GB stacking the box to stop Smith until Daunte proves he can beat them with his arm. Or proves he can’t…
Deacon Blades Boyd, CofS: This is as simple as simple can get. Run the ball whenever Aaron Kampman is on the field. The Packers had an All Pro DE in Kampman then for some reason decided to try and turn him into an outside rush linebacker and to say he’s struggling would be a drastic understatement. Sure he’s great against the pass but he’s a serious liability in the run.
Reverend Spielman, CofS: Everyone and their brother are going to be expecting the Lions to run the ball early and because of this, I think you have to pass early and often, no matter which QB starts. Because there will be additional men in the box(likely a safety), I think the middle of the field will be open season. We need to utilize Pettigrew and Northcutt in there and use the outside receivers as decoys. Once the passing game gets going, it’ll force the Pack to take that extra man out of the box, and thats when Kevin Smith will be best utilized.
2. Which players have been the biggest positive surprise and the biggest negative surprise this year?
Steve, Detroit Lions Weblog: The player who has been most surprising in a positive way for me has been Jason Hunter. Coming virtually out of nowhere as a Packers castoff he has been pretty solid at a position where the Lions don’t possess a lot of talent. In other words, I hate to think about where they would be without him, at this point.
The player who has been a surprise in a negative way is Phillip Buchanon. Admittedly, Buchanon has had a checkered career. But given his improved performance during recent seasons, I expected that he would have no problem procuring a starting job in the Lions incredibly weak secondary. Unfortunately, he has found it difficult to garner playing time.
Phil, MLive: Let’s end with the positive. My negative surprise would be Phillip Buchanon. It’s not like I thought the guy would be Deion Sanders. After all, you don’t find shutdown corners on the market very often. But I thought he’d be a cut above Brian Kelly. He’s turned out to be a major disappointment with his “major” contribution being on special teams. Uhh, I’m not sure that’s what Martin Mayhew had in mind when he signed the veteran corner. As for the positive, though he’s in the media all the time, I have to go with Matthew Stafford. I was an “Aaron Curry guy” leading up to the draft, but Stafford has shown way more potential than I ever thought he would. He’s improved every single week, and the most impressive thing has been how the rookie has displayed the nuances of playing quarterback, such as modifying his cadence. I’m really anxious to see what he does when he returns from injury and has several games in a row to grow, hopefully with Calvin on the other side of his receptions. The potential is there to be really exciting.
Big Al, The Wayne Fontes Experience: Postitive: OT Gosder Churilus. The massive offensive lineman carries the weight of being the final number one pick of the worst general manager in sports history, Matt Millen. Churilus didn’t play all that well as a rookie, as he couldn’t beat out incumbent at right tackle, the oft benched and constantly ridiculed George Foster, in training camp. He finally took over the position 3 games into the regular season, but never stood out in the way you’d hope the 17th overall pick of the draft would.
This season, Churilus has been rock solid from day one. There are plenty of issues on the Lions’ offensive line //cough//JeffBackus//cough//, but the 2nd year tackle has not been one of them. For all the talk of playing for the future, and many of the veterans on the current roster not being around in a year or two, Churilus will be a Lion for the long haul. He, along with fellow number one picks Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson, will be a big part of what’s hoped to be the resurgence of the Lions under Jim Schwartz.
Negative: One player stands out. OLB Julian Peterson. Say what you will about the player the Lions traded to get Peterson, Cory Redding, he did fill a need for the Lions on the defensive line. The Lions weakened what was already a not very good D-line in order to get Peterson, who was supposed to be the Pro Bowl caliber play maker the Lions have needed since…well, damn near forever.
Though it was obvious he was beginning to decline in his last season with Seattle, it was hoped a new environment, and the Lions honoring a contract Seattle was thinking of lopping off of their roster, would give Peterson a new lease on football life. For whatever reason (scheme, teammates, or the most likely reason, age) Peterson has not lived to his glittering reputation.
Peterson has been average at best, far from the Pro Bowl shoo-in he once was, while Larry Foote and DeAndre Levy have picked up the line backing slack. If Peterson doesn’t step up his game, I can see 2009 being his only season in a Detroit uniform.
Jeff, Motown Madmen: My positive would be the 2009 draft class. I know, one player, but I’ve been impressed with the overall performance of this group so far and am please that the draft went so well (we’ll find out for sure in a couple years).
My negative would be the offensive line. Again, not a single player (could be Backus as he’s not a dominate LT). They’ve improved a little but the QB’s still don’ have a lot of time in the pocket and the running game has not really opened up.
Josh, Roar of the Lions: One positive surprise for me has to be Deandre Levy. I didn’t know who he was when the Lions indicated they traded down and still got the guy they would have taken at the top of 3. While I was thrilled with getting Hill, I thought Levy was an odd pick. Not anymore. He has already shown capable of playing all three LB positions well, and seems to be growing better with each game. Sure, he’s had some rookie mistakes but has played well above what I was expecting out of him by the end of the year, much less after 5 games.
I am disappointed by the play of Cliff Avril. I know he has been battling an injury, but he has not shown any of the flashes of the off the edge rush that had me excited to see him progress this year. Instead, we see him struggling to even make an impact as a 3rd down specialist much less an every down DE.
Deacon Blades Boyd, CofS: Positive has to be Levy. The guys going to be a damn good player for years to come. Disappointment has to be Cliff Avril. I mean what the hell happened to this guy??!?!?!? Actually, I could say the same thing for Grady Jackson and Julian Peterson as well.
Reverend Spielman, CofS: The biggest positive for me has to be DeAndre Levy. He’s far surpassed my expectations of him. He is definitely a building block for the defense in the future. The biggest disappointment has been the man Levy has been replacing, Ernie Sims. I haven’t seen any improvement from Sims in the 3 years he’s been in the league. He’s still the same player he was as a rookie and still making rookie mistakes. He needs to stop overpursueing plays if he wants to stay on the field.
3. Whats your projected score for Lions-Packers?
Steve, Detroit Lions Weblog: If Mark Tauscher and Chad Clifton are back and effective, the Lions will lose by two TD’s. If not, Aaron Rodgers and Daunte Culpepper could each struggle as both teams enjoy an unexpected ability to pressure their respective opposing passer. Given the fact that the Lions have not won in Green Bay since 1991, there is no reasonable way to believe that is going to change now, especially without Calvin Johnson and Matthew Stafford.
Packers 31 Lions 20
Phil, MLive: If the Lions can take advantage of the Packers’ weak offensive line, I will definitely be wrong here. But injuries might be too much to overcome. Packers 27, Lions 17
Big Al, The Wayne Fontes Experience: The Lions haven’t beat the Packers at home since the Majik Man, Don Majkowski, was scrambling around the frozen tundra for the Pack. That was 19 games ago, as the Lions have lost 18 consecutive road games to Green Bay.
Another of Detroit’s long losing streak continues, as a Lions team without Stafford or Johnson doesn’t have a chance in Hell of beating the Pack at Lambeau Field. The man who replaced the man who replaced The Majik Man, Aaron Rogers, has a field day picking apart the Lions’ defense, while Stafford’s caddy at quarterback, Daunte Culpepper, continues his struggles in the red zone.
Green Bay 35 – Detroit 16.
Jeff, Motown Madmen: Vegas has the line at 13 in favor of the Pack and the O/U at 48. The weather in Green Bay is expected to by in the low 40’s and partly cloudy at game time. I wouldn’t think that will be a factor. The Lions look to have several players sit out this week, possibly including Stafford, Megatron and Ernie Sims (good idea on all three, bring them back after the bye week). I see Rodgers having a good game against the Detroit secondary but the Lions keeping it reasonably close.
Packers 24 – Lions 17. I’d take the Lions against the spread and the under.
Josh, Roar of the Lions: Hmmm… I’m going to say “shoot-out” and leave it at that. If Daunte starts, Lions in the 20’s somewhere and the Pack ring up 30, but not 40. Anyone else note that of the 20 year losing streak at Lambeau, the Lions have only played the Pack in the first half of the season at the Pack 3 times? The other 17 were late, with at least 3 the final game of the season when the Frozen Tundra home advantage was in full play. Just sayin.
If Stafford starts, I still think the Lions lose — but a close shoot out. They have a chance win as the Pack are more beatable right now than any opponent other than Washington this season — unfortunately, I don’t think this team is ready to play the kind of game they need to on the road to secure the win. It will take a minimization of mistakes ala the Steelers game that I just don’t see happening at Lambeau.
Deacon Blades Boyd, CofS: With Calvin for a full game, Lions 27-Packers 21. Without Calvin, Packers 31- Lions 13.
Reverend Spielman, CofS: If Matthew Stafford starts, we win this game. If Daunte starts, I think the only way we win is if the defensive line and linebackers get serious pressure on Aaron Rodgers. I don’t see that happening and I see the Packers winning a close shootout because of this.